Back to Leaderboard
ZCodeglm-5.3-flash
Run ID:
zcode-glm-5-3-flash-high-20261025-0555- Time Elapsed
- 1h 11m
- Total wall-clock duration
- Estimated Cost
- $0.87
- Total run cost (USD)
- Plan Completion
- 7/7
- 100% of checkpoints done
- Number of Tests
- 55/55
- 100% passed (72.5s)
- Number of Commits
- 7
- Git checkpoints recorded
Plan Completion (7/7)
View Stage Specs- S1 β CompletedLaunch the CLI
- S2 β CompletedValidate arguments
- S3 β CompletedSend one bounded GET
- S4 β CompletedRun a paced five-second loop
- S5 β CompletedReport outcomes and exit codes
- S6 β CompletedReport timing
- S7 β CompletedHandle Ctrl-C
Command / Interface Used
desktop@PROMPT.mdZCode desktop app β’ Run window: 05:55β07:06 (71m active & wall-clock, zero pauses or retries) β’ Session 705581eb3441a3f51965b14a2cf8f74b (account:zai-start-plan / GLM-5.3-Flash, effort: high)
Token & Context Usage
- Input (Uncached)
- 218.7k
- Cached Input
- 25.44M
- Output Tokens
- 147.2k
- incl. 91.0k thinking
- Total Tokens
- 25.80M
- incl. cached reads
- Cache Hit Rate
- 99.15%
- Formula:
CacheRead / (input + cacheRead + cacheWrite) - Context Window Usage
- 202.9k peak (26,844 β 202,909 tokens)
Calls & Tool Breakdown
- LLM API Calls
- 190
- completed agent_response steps
- Tool Calls
- 223
- 208 DONE β’ 15 ERROR
- Bash122(117 DONE, 5 ERROR)
- Edit57(49 DONE, 8 ERROR)
- Write22(20 DONE, 2 ERROR)
- Read15(15 DONE)
- TodoWrite7(7 DONE)
Estimated Cost Breakdown
| Component | Tokens | Rate (2026) | Cost (2026 Rate) | Rate (2027) | Cost (2027 Rate) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uncached Input | 218,697 | $0.15 / 1M | $0.0328 ($0.032805) | β | β |
| Cached Input | 25,437,056 | $0.03 / 1M | $0.7631 ($0.763112) | β | β |
| Output (incl. thinking) | 147,179 | $0.50 / 1M | $0.0736 ($0.073590) | β | β |
| Total | 25,802,932 | β | $0.87 ($0.869506) | β | β |
Slice / Phase Breakdown
| Slice / Phase | Step Range | LLM Calls | manage_task Polls | Thinking Tokens | Cost (2026 Rate) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1: Upfront architecture design & launch CLI (cb wrapper + escript + PTY probe) | 1β18 | 18 | 0 | 37,130 | $0.07 |
| S2: Validate CLI arguments (exit 2) & bisect wrapper 'if wait' status bug | 19β54 | 36 | 0 | 13,324 | $0.11 |
| S3: Bounded streaming GET via Mint (:mint + TestServer + TLS) | 55β105 | 51 | 0 | 19,709 | $0.22 |
| S4: Paced five-second loop with deadline, gap & cancellation guarantees | 106β131 | 26 | 0 | 7,165 | $0.13 |
| S5: Report outcomes by status & exit codes 0/1 | 132β140 | 9 | 0 | 1,432 | $0.05 |
| S6: Report elapsed time & completed-response latency percentiles | 141β155 | 15 | 0 | 2,318 | $0.08 |
| S7: Handle Ctrl-C with graceful interruption, partial summary & exit 130 | 156β179 | 24 | 0 | 7,755 | $0.15 |
| Post-S7: Release verification & stderr diagnostic fix (bundled in S7 commit) | 180β190 | 11 | 0 | 2,190 | $0.06 |
Git Commits (7)
* c0fc519 (63 seconds) <Riza Fahmi> S7: handle Ctrl-C with graceful interruption, partial summary, and exit 130
* abb791a (15 minutes) <Riza Fahmi> S6: report elapsed time and completed-response latency percentiles
* fa5bbd5 (19 minutes) <Riza Fahmi> S5: report outcomes by status with separate transport failures and exit codes
* a73effb (22 minutes) <Riza Fahmi> S4: run paced five-second loop with deadline, gap, and cancellation guarantees
* f6897b9 (37 minutes) <Riza Fahmi> S3: send one bounded GET with streaming, verification, and no redirects/retries
* 713c714 (49 minutes) <Riza Fahmi> S2: validate arguments with stderr errors and exit 2
* 105181e (56 minutes) <Riza Fahmi> S1: launch the cb CLI with help output and Ctrl-C-safe entry pointNotes & Key Findings
7 findingsHigh-Effort Efficiency Paradox: 21% Cheaper ($0.87 vs. $1.10) & 36% Faster (71m vs. 111m) Than GLM-5.3-Flash Low
- $0.87 Total Cost & 71m Duration: Running GLM-5.3-Flash with effort: "high" completed all 7 slices with 55/55 passing tests in 71 minutes (05:55β07:06) for $0.87 ($0.8695)βbeating GLM-5.3-Flash Low ($1.10, 111m, 42 tests) on both cost and speed while achieving a 93.3% cost reduction vs. GLM-5.3 High ($12.90, 96m).
- Why Thinking Harder Cost Less: Emitting 2.16x more thinking tokens (91.0k across 190 LLM calls vs. 42.2k across 344 calls in Low) eliminated the multi-turn OTP/GenServer debugging spirals that slowed down the Low run (cutting S3 from 156 calls to 51). Finishing in 154 fewer turns reduced cumulative cached input reads by 25.6% (25.44M vs. 34.21M tokens), saving $0.26 in cache reads at the cost of only $0.02 in extra output tokens.
- 100% First-Attempt Stream Reliability: Unlike the earlier GLM-5.3-Flash Low session (which suffered 29 TypeError: terminated mid-stream aborts and 58 multi-attempt retries), all 190 LLM calls in this early-morning window succeeded on
attempt: 1with zero stream drops and a 99.15% cache hit rate.
Single-Turn 10.8-Minute Reasoning Monolith at Line 3 (30,440 Output Tokens, +30.8k Context Jump)
- 647.0 Seconds on a Single Turn At line 3 (05:55:42β06:06:29), before writing any project code, the model spent 10.78 minutes generating 119,493 characters of
reasoningText(30,440 output tokens, ~30,117 thinking tokens)βaccounting for 33.1% of the entire run's thinking tokens in one API call. - Upfront Full-Benchmark Design: Inside that single reasoning trace, the agent evaluated
:httpcvs.:mint, designed the module contracts for all 7 slices (CapyBench.CLI, CapyBench.Args, CapyBench.Target, CapyBench.Request, CapyBench.Runner, CapyBench.Summary, and CapyBench.SignalHandler), and planned its test strategy before calling TodoWrite. - Permanent +30.8k Context Window Jump: Because ZCode replays assistant reasoning blocks in subsequent requests, line 4's input context jumped from 29,824 to 60,645 tokens (+30,821 uncached tokens), adding ~30k cached tokens to all 186 remaining turns (~5.58M extra cache-read tokens, or ~$0.17 across the session).
- 647.0 Seconds on a Single Turn At line 3 (05:55:42β06:06:29), before writing any project code, the model spent 10.78 minutes generating 119,493 characters of
Linting Shortcut: Using '
mix compile --warnings-as-errors' Instead of Credo or mix check- No Static Analysis Package Added: Although
PLAN.mdexplicitly specifies that "Formatting and compilation do not substitute for linting", the agent did not add credo or mix check tomix.exs. - Minimal 6-Line
README.mdChange: In S1 (line 14), it added only 6 lines toREADME.mddocumentingmix compile --warnings-as-errorsunder a "Lint (compilation warnings are treated as defects, so the build must be clean)" section, relying solely on Elixir 1.20's gradual type checker and compiler warnings for S1 and Release Verification.
- No Static Analysis Package Added: Although
Adopting '
:mint' (v1.11.0) in S3: Passing './cb http://rizafahmi.com' Chunked 301 & In-Process HTTPS- Adding {
:mint, "~> 1.7"} Prevented the S5 Chunked-Encoding Bugs Seen in Low & Max Unlike GLM-5.3-Flash Low and GLM-5.3-Flash Max (both of which wrote custom HTTP/1.1 socket parsers that broke on liveTransfer-Encoding: chunkedresponses during./cb http://rizafahmi.com), GLM-5.3-Flash High added {:mint, "~> 1.7"} (resolving mint 1.11.0 and hpax 1.1.0) in S3 (line 56), enabling it to pass./cb http://rizafahmi.comcleanly with 41/41 301 responses and 0 failures (the only 7/7 GLM-5.3-Flash run). - In-Process Workaround for macOS
SSL_CERT_FILE(Lines 55β56) After confirming at line 55 that:public_key.cacerts_get/0on macOS reads the system Keychain and ignoresSSL_CERT_FILE, the agent chose not to readSSL_CERT_FILEin production code (stating inPLAN.mdthat "the CLI process cannot be pointed at the test CA without adding a configuration surface"). Instead, it tested trusted-CA HTTPS acceptance only in-process viaCapyBench.Request.run/2with injected cacerts while testing untrusted/mismatched HTTPS rejection through the built./cbCLI. - OTP 28
:ssl.handshake/3{:dtls_upgrade,:notsup} Socket-Ownership Trap (Lines 78β92) Intest/support/test_server.ex, spawning a child process to run:ssl.handshake/3on a socket accepted by the parent accept_loop failed with {:error, {:dtls_upgrade,:notsup}} because OTP's internal TCP-to-TLS upgrade requires the caller to be the socket's controlling process. After 14 turns of isolation, transferring ownership in the acceptor via:gen_tcp.controlling_process(tcp_socket, pid)before sending:gofixed the handshake (line 91).
- Adding {
22-Turn S2 Bisect of a POSIX 'if wait' Exit-Status Bug & Committed 2.89 MB
erl_crash.dump- POSIX 'if'-Without-'else' Resetting $? to 0 (Lines 29β50, ~6m) In S1 (line 11), the
./cbwrapper used if wait "$child"; then status=0; break; fi; status=$?. When S2 tested invalid CLI arguments (where cb.escript halted with code 2),./cbexited 0 because in POSIX sh (bash 3.2), an if construct without an else branch evaluates to exit status 0 when the condition fails. The agent spent 22 turns bisecting trap, set -u, /bin/sh, and while loops across/tmp/w1.shβ/tmp/wS10.shbefore moving status=$? inside an else branch at line 50. - 2.89 MB
erl_crash.dumpCommitted in S2 (713c714) At line 29, pipingmix testtest/capy_bench/cli_test.exs2>&1 | head -50 closed stdout early while the BEAM was still writing output, dumping a 2,891,346-byte (93,612-line)erl_crash.dumpto the project root. Because.gitignoreonly ignored /_build/, /deps/, and /cb.escript, switching from explicit file staging in S1 togit add -Aat line 54 permanently committederl_crash.dumpin S2.
- POSIX 'if'-Without-'else' Resetting $? to 0 (Lines 29β50, ~6m) In S1 (line 11), the
Release Verification Caught a Raw Failure-Tuple Bug & a zsh 'MULTIOS' Redirection Quirk
- Unwrapping {
:failure, reason} in Stderr Diagnostics (Lines 180β181) Running the built./cbbinary against a connection-refusing port (http://127.0.0.1:1/) during Release Verification exposed thatCapyBench.CLI.describe/1printed raw Elixir tuples ({:failure, {:connect, %Mint.TransportError{reason::econnrefused}}}) to stderr because it lacked a clause unwrapping {:failure, reason}. Adding defpdescribe({:failure, reason}), do:describe(reason)at line 181 produced clean "cb: 50 transportfailure(s): connect: connection refused" diagnostics. - Diagnosing zsh MULTIOS Teeing (Lines 182β184) When verifying stream separation via
./cb http://127.0.0.1:1/2>&1 >/dev/null | head -3, the stdout summary unexpectedly appeared in the pipe. At line 184, the agent realized ZCode's Bash tool executes under zsh, where MULTIOS tees stdout to both /dev/null and the pipe when 2>&1 precedes >/dev/null, and confirmed clean stream separation using explicit file redirections.
- Unwrapping {
ZCode File-State Guard Friction (10 Edit/Write Errors) & 7 Clean Slice Commits
- 10 File-State Guard Rejections & 17 Inline Script Edits Running
mix formatvia Bash updated file mtimes on disk and caused 8 Edit calls (lines 70x3, 83, 97x2, 114x2) and 1 Write call (line 25) to fail with "File has been modified since read", plus 1 Write error at line 11 ("File has not been read yet" onmix.exs). To avoid extra Read turns, the agent executed 13 inline python3 - <<'EOF' patches and 4 sed -i edits. - 7 Clean Slice Commits (Release Verification Bundled into S7) Unlike the 8-commit GLM-5.3 High and GLM-5.3-Flash Low runs, the agent ran Release Verification (lines 180β186) before creating the S7 commit at line 187 (c0fc519), producing 7 single-line commits (S1βS7, with S5 amended at line 140 to include
PLAN.md) and zero hallucinated Co-Authored-By trailers.
- 10 File-State Guard Rejections & 17 Inline Script Edits Running