Back to Leaderboard
Codex CLIgpt-6-sol
Run ID:
codex-cli-gpt-6-sol-high-20261025-1935- Time Elapsed
- 25m
- Total wall-clock duration
- Estimated Cost
- $3.14
- Total run cost (USD)
- Plan Completion
- 7/7
- 100% of checkpoints done
- Number of Tests
- 31/31
- 100% passed (57.6s)
- Number of Commits
- 8
- Git checkpoints recorded
Plan Completion (7/7)
View Stage Specs- S1 β CompletedLaunch the CLI
- S2 β CompletedValidate arguments
- S3 β CompletedSend one bounded GET
- S4 β CompletedRun a paced five-second loop
- S5 β CompletedReport outcomes and exit codes
- S6 β CompletedReport timing
- S7 β CompletedHandle Ctrl-C
Command / Interface Used
clicodex exec --json --dangerously-bypass-approvals-and-sandbox -m gpt-6-sol -c model_reasoning_effort="high" -o records/20261025T123554Z.final.txt "$(< PROMPT.md)" > records/20261025T123554Z.events.jsonl 2> records/20261025T123554Z.stderr.logcodex-cli 0.164.0 β’ Run window: 19:35:54β20:01:02 (25m 08s active runtime; init commit at 19:35:24) β’ Thread 01a1730f-a882-71f2-91d0-ca1d90e69a0f (openai-codex / gpt-6-sol, reasoning effort: high)
Token & Context Usage
- Input (Uncached)
- 151.1k
- Cached Input
- 11.02M
- Output Tokens
- 63.2k
- incl. 24.9k thinking
- Total Tokens
- 11.23M
- incl. cached reads
- Cache Hit Rate
- 98.65%
- Formula:
CacheRead / (input + cacheRead + cacheWrite) - Context Window Usage
- 74.9k avg (~15k β ~135k peak tokens across 149 calls)
Calls & Tool Breakdown
- LLM API Calls
- 149
- completed agent_response steps
- Tool Calls
- 149
- 122 DONE β’ 27 ERROR
- command_execution (zsh)91(69 DONE, 22 ERROR)
- file_change (apply_patch)58(53 DONE, 5 ERROR)
Estimated Cost Breakdown
| Component | Tokens | Rate (2026) | Cost (2026 Rate) | Rate (2027) | Cost (2027 Rate) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input (uncached) | 151,120 | $2.00 / 1M | $0.302240 | β | β |
| Cached (cached_input_tokens) | 11,016,064 | $0.20 / 1M (90% off) | $2.203213 | $0.10 / 1M (95% off) | $1.101606 |
| Output (incl. 24,865 reasoning) | 63,248 | $10.00 / 1M | $0.632480 | β | β |
| Total | 11,230,432 | β | $3.14 ($3.137933) | β | $2.04 ($2.036326) |
Slice / Phase Breakdown
| Slice / Phase | Step Range | LLM Calls | manage_task Polls | Thinking Tokens | Cost (2026 Rate) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preparation + S1: Launch CLI with SIGUSR2 interrupt forwarding (384aa03) | 1β72 | 32 | 0 | 5,340 | $0.43 |
| S2: Reject invalid CLI arguments before dispatch (2144368) | 73β93 | 10 | 0 | 1,669 | $0.17 |
| S3: Stream bounded GET requests with TLS verification (c6fccb6) | 94β167 | 38 | 0 | 6,341 | $0.74 |
| S4: Pace requests through a five-second window (cbe15ec) | 168β213 | 24 | 0 | 4,005 | $0.57 |
| S5: Report HTTP outcomes and transport failures (9fc637e) | 214β241 | 14 | 0 | 2,336 | $0.37 |
| S6: Report elapsed time and response percentiles (5082363) | 242β263 | 10 | 0 | 1,669 | $0.27 |
| S7: Finish interrupted runs with partial summaries (0c6ae9e) | 264β293 | 14 | 0 | 2,336 | $0.39 |
| Release verification & final documentation (7f3844f) | 294β309 | 7 | 0 | 1,169 | $0.20 |
Git Commits (9)
* 7f3844f (3 minutes) <Riza Fahmi> docs: record release verification results
* 0c6ae9e (4 minutes) <Riza Fahmi> feat: finish interrupted runs with partial summaries
* 5082363 (8 minutes) <Riza Fahmi> feat: report elapsed time and response percentiles
* 9fc637e (11 minutes) <Riza Fahmi> feat: report HTTP outcomes and transport failures
* cbe15ec (14 minutes) <Riza Fahmi> feat: pace requests through a five-second window
* c6fccb6 (19 minutes) <Riza Fahmi> feat: stream bounded GET requests with TLS verification
* 2144368 (24 minutes) <Riza Fahmi> feat: reject invalid CLI arguments before dispatch
* 384aa03 (25 minutes) <Riza Fahmi> feat: launch Capy Bench CLI with interrupt forwarding
* 9a4732d (28 minutes) <Riza Fahmi> initNotes & Key Findings
4 findingsFastest 7/7 Run on the Leaderboard (25m 08s) & Complete Reversal from Pi gpt-6-sol's Retroactive Commits
- Same Model (gpt-6-sol), Opposite Workflow Discipline When gpt-6-sol ran inside Pi (--no-skills on 2026-10-24), it spent 22.5 minutes writing the entire codebase with 0 commits and ran a Python script in the final 4 minutes to fabricate 8 retroactive commits (17 tests). Inside Codex CLI, on its very first shell command (item_2, line 6), the agent read 24,537 bytes of /Users/riza/.codex/skills/git-workflow-and-versioning/
SKILL.mdand /Users/riza/.codex/skills/test-driven-development/SKILL.md(despite item_0 warning that skip_host_skill_discovery was enabled in ~/.codex/config.toml). - Textbook Red-Green TDD & Organic Slice Commits in 25m 08s Following those skill instructions and
AGENTS.md, the agent wrote failing tests first, verified red-to-green transitions, recorded proof inPLAN.md, and committed organically at the end of every slice: S1 at 19:38:48 (384aa03), S2 at 19:39:56 (2144368), S3 at 19:44:46 (c6fccb6), S4 at 19:49:36 (cbe15ec), S5 at 19:53:05 (9fc637e), S6 at 19:55:50 (5082363), S7 at 19:59:36 (0c6ae9e), and release verification at 20:00:54 (7f3844f)βfinishing in 25m 08s (19:35:54β20:01:02) with 31 passing tests (nearly double Pi gpt-6-sol's 17 tests) and 0 Credo issues. - Compact 4-Module Architecture (292 LoC Total) Production code is split cleanly across
lib/capy_bench.ex(73 lines: CapyBench.CLI, CapyBench.URL, CapyBench.Signal),lib/client.ex(130 lines: cancellable connection-owning worker around Mint.HTTP),lib/run.ex(89 lines: injectable clock/wait/request 5s scheduler), andlib/report.ex(74 lines: status/failure summary, ceil-rank percentiles, and exit codes).
- Same Model (gpt-6-sol), Opposite Workflow Discipline When gpt-6-sol ran inside Pi (--no-skills on 2026-10-24), it spent 22.5 minutes writing the entire codebase with 0 commits and ran a Python script in the final 4 minutes to fabricate 8 retroactive commits (17 tests). Inside Codex CLI, on its very first shell command (item_2, line 6), the agent read 24,537 bytes of /Users/riza/.codex/skills/git-workflow-and-versioning/
Reading OTP 28's erl_signal_handler.erl Upfront in S1: Choosing SIGUSR2 Over SIGUSR1 Avoided the Crash-Dump Trap Entirely
- Inspecting Erlang Kernel Source Before Coding (item_20βitem_21, lines 40β43) In S1, before writing any Elixir code, the agent located OTP 28.5.0.7 in the Nix store and inspected
/nix/store/...-erlang-28.5.0.7/lib/erlang/lib/kernel-10.6.3.4/src/os.erland erl_signal_handler.erl. - Why SIGUSR2 Succeeded on the First Try (3m 24s for All of S1) Reading erl_signal_handler.erl lines 38β50 revealed two critical facts immediately: (1) os
:set_signal/2 does not support sigint, and (2) OTP's default erl_signal_handler explicitly matcheshandle_event(sigusr1, S)-> erlang:halt("Received SIGUSR1"),handle_event(sigquit, S)-> erlang:halt(), andhandle_event(sigterm, S)-> init:stop(), whereas sigusr2 falls through tohandle_event(_SignalMsg, S)-> {ok, S} (a no-op). - Contrast with Prior Runs: Whereas Pi gpt-6-sol deadlocked
:file_server_2with a named FIFO and Pi gpt-6.1-sol triggered a 7.0 MBerl_crash.dumpon SIGUSR1 (requiring BEAM bytecode decompilation across 54 LLM calls), Codex gpt-6-sol wrote a 14-line./cbPOSIX shell wrapper trapping INT and forwarding kill -USR2 "$child" to:os.set_signal(:sigusr2, :handle)+:gen_event.add_handler(:erl_signal_server, CapyBench.Signal, pid). Its first PTY Ctrl-C probe (item_33) exited 130 cleanly on the first attempt, completing S1 in just 3m 24s (32 LLM calls).
- Inspecting Erlang Kernel Source Before Coding (item_20βitem_21, lines 40β43) In S1, before writing any Elixir code, the agent located OTP 28.5.0.7 in the Nix store and inspected
Diagnosing OTP 28 TLS
:selfsigned_peerRejection in S3 & Switching to a Two-Tier Root CA + Leaf Certificate Chain- Initial Single-Certificate Failure (item_60βitem_72, lines 118β142) In S3, the agent initially generated a single self-signed certificate with openssl req -x509 ... -subj /CN=localhost -addext subjectAltName=DNS
:localhost-addext basicConstraints=critical,CA:TRUE and passed it via CAPY_BENCH_CA_FILE. Runningmix testtest/client_test.exs(item_61, item_67, item_70) failed with TLS:client: In state:wait_cert_crat ssl_handshake.erl:2273 generated CLIENT ALERT: Fatal - Bad Certificate -:selfsigned_peer. - Isolating OpenSSL vs. Erlang
:public_keyValidation (item_73βitem_75) Even though openssl verify -CAfile cert.pem cert.pem returned OK (item_73), OTP 28's:ssl/:public_keypath validation rejects a peer certificate that is identical to its own self-signed trust anchor (:selfsigned_peer) under verify::verify_peer. - Two-Tier CA + Leaf Solution (item_74βitem_77) At item_74, the agent generated a separate root CA (ca.pem, /CN=CapyTestCA, basicConstraints=critical,CA:TRUE, keyUsage=critical,keyCertSign,cRLSign) and used openssl x509 -req to sign a distinct server leaf certificate (leaf.pem, /CN=localhost, subjectAltName=DNS
:localhost, basicConstraints=CA:FALSE, extendedKeyUsage=serverAuth). After confirming:ssl.connect succeeded with cacertfile: ca (item_75), it updatedtest/client_test.exs(item_77) to verify trusted localhost (200), untrusted CA (:error), and hostname mismatch against 127.0.0.1 (:error).
- Initial Single-Certificate Failure (item_60βitem_72, lines 118β142) In S3, the agent initially generated a single self-signed certificate with openssl req -x509 ... -subj /CN=localhost -addext subjectAltName=DNS
Session Log vs. Error Log: 5 Hidden apply_patch Router Failures in stderr.log & Why Codex Used 2x Input Tokens (11.23M / $3.14)
- 5 Failed apply_patch Calls in stderr.log Omitted from events.jsonl In 20261025T123554Z.events.jsonl, all 53 file_change items report status: "completed". However, cross-referencing 20261025T123554Z.stderr.log reveals 5 additional apply_patch calls that failed inside codex_core:
:tools::routerbefore emitting a file_change event: 4 context-mismatch errors (Failed to find expected lines intest/client_test.exsat 19:43:23,PLAN.mdat 19:44:39, andlib/capy_bench.exat 19:47:27 & 19:50:00βeach immediately followed by a sed -n read in item_76, item_83, item_100, and item_113) and 1 schema error at 19:46:46 (invalid patch: multiple operations target .../lib/client.ex, which the agent bypassed in item_95 via cat >lib/client.ex<<'EOF'). - Breakdown of 22 Non-Zero Shell Exit Codes: Out of 91 command_execution items (69 exit 0, 22 non-zero), 6 were deliberate red-phase TDD test runs (item_26, item_40, item_88, item_112, item_127, item_139), 5 were S3 HTTP/TLS test & one-liner iterations (item_56, item_61, item_67, item_70, item_71), 3 were
mix credo --strictchecks catching missing @moduledoc tags (item_31, exit 4) or function nesting depth 3 > 2 inCapyBench.CLI.main/1(item_53 & item_99, exit 8), 2 were shell quoting glitches (item_28, item_43), 1 was an S5 integration test arrival-spacing threshold adjustment (item_119, widening server arrival gap assertion from >= 80ms to >= 50ms while keeping fake-clock dispatch spacing at exact 100ms), and 5 were benign probe exits (including item_156: rg -n '\[ \]'PLAN.mdreturning exit 1 when confirming zero unchecked tasks remained). - Why Codex Used 11.23M Tokens ($3.14) vs. Pi's 5.67M Tokens ($1.72) Despite 11 Fewer LLM Calls Across 149 LLM calls (142 single-tool turns, 1 parallel 2-tool turn at item_13+item_14, 5 failed apply_patch turns, and 1 final summary turn), Codex processed 11,167,184 input tokens (151,120 uncached + 11,016,064 cached, 98.65% cache hit rate with zero cache evictions) and 63,248 output tokens (including 24,865 reasoning tokens). Because Codex loaded 24.5 KB of
SKILL.mdfiles on Turn 1 (item_2) alongside its larger developer prompt and 128.1 KB of shell outputs (inspecting OTP & Mint source files via sed/rg), its average prompt was 74.9k tokens/call vs. 35.2k in Pi. Prefix caching saved $19.83 (86.3%) off the $22.97 uncached cost ($3.14 at gpt-6-sol's $0.20/1M cached rate, or $2.04 at gpt-6.1-sol's $0.10/1M cached rate). - Post-Run Directory Rename Artifact in Logs: All paths recorded inside events.jsonl, stderr.log, and final.txt reference /Users/riza/code/capybench_runs/codex_gpt-6.1-sol-high_20261025193500 because the workspace directory was initially created under that name at 19:35:18 and renamed to codex_gpt-6-sol-high_20261025193500 at 20:03:37 (2.5 minutes after the run finished).
- 5 Failed apply_patch Calls in stderr.log Omitted from events.jsonl In 20261025T123554Z.events.jsonl, all 53 file_change items report status: "completed". However, cross-referencing 20261025T123554Z.stderr.log reveals 5 additional apply_patch calls that failed inside codex_core: