Back to Leaderboard
antigravity cligemini-3.8-flash-high
Run ID:
agy-gemini-3-8-flash-high-20261024-0635- Time Elapsed
- 46m
- Total wall-clock duration
- Estimated Cost
- $5.43
- Total run cost (USD)
- Plan Completion
- 7/7
- 100% of checkpoints done
- Number of Tests
- 41/41
- 100% passed (100.7s)
- Number of Commits
- 7
- Git checkpoints recorded
Plan Completion (7/7)
View Stage Specs- S1 — CompletedLaunch the CLI
- S2 — CompletedValidate arguments
- S3 — CompletedSend one bounded GET
- S4 — CompletedRun a paced five-second loop
- S5 — CompletedReport outcomes and exit codes
- S6 — CompletedReport timing
- S7 — CompletedHandle Ctrl-C
Command / Interface Used
cliagy --mode auto --dangerously-skip-permissions --model gemini-3.8-flash-high --effort high --output-format stream-json --print "$(< PROMPT.md)" > records/events.jsonlRun window: 05:49–06:35 (46m) • No README changes
Token & Context Usage
- Input (Uncached)
- 1.05M
- Cached Input
- 54.41M
- Output Tokens
- 151.9k
- incl. 69.2k thinking
- Total Tokens
- 55.60M
- incl. cached reads
- Cache Hit Rate
- 98.11%
- Formula:
CacheRead / (input + cacheRead + cacheWrite) - Context Window Usage
- 26.88% out of 1.0M (268.8k peak)
Calls & Tool Breakdown
- LLM API Calls
- 388
- completed agent_response steps
- Tool Calls
- 387
- 384 DONE • 3 ERROR
- run_command177(177 DONE)
- manage_task105(105 DONE)
- edit_file68(66 DONE, 2 ERROR)
- write_file19(18 DONE, 1 ERROR)
- read_file13(13 DONE)
- search_web5(5 DONE)
Estimated Cost Breakdown
| Component | Tokens | Rate (2026) | Cost (2026 Rate) | Rate (2027) | Cost (2027 Rate) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uncached Input | 1,046,593 | $0.75 / 1M | $0.7849 | $1.50 / 1M | $1.5699 |
| Cached Input | 54,406,484 | $0.075 / 1M | $4.0805 | $0.15 / 1M | $8.1610 |
| Output (incl. thinking) | 151,851 | $3.75 / 1M | $0.5694 | $7.50 / 1M | $1.1389 |
| Total | 55,604,928 | — | $5.43 ($5.4349) | — | $10.87 ($10.8697) |
Slice / Phase Breakdown
| Slice / Phase | Step Range | LLM Calls | manage_task Polls | Thinking Tokens | Cost (2026 Rate) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1: Launch CLI & resolve SIGINT entry point | 1–219 | 107 | 17 | 22,642 | $0.73 |
| S2: Validate CLI arguments | 220–263 | 22 | 0 | 3,716 | $0.20 |
| S3: Bounded GET (Mint, TLS, 2s timeout) | 264–378 | 56 | 4 | 14,272 | $0.68 |
| S4: Paced 5-second loop | 379–451 | 35 | 12 | 5,940 | $0.52 |
| S5: Report outcomes & exit codes | 452–529 | 37 | 16 | 3,891 | $0.59 |
| S6: Report timing & percentiles | 530–573 | 21 | 3 | 3,713 | $0.38 |
| S7: Handle Ctrl-C (PTY tests) | 574–730 | 76 | 30 | 13,699 | $1.60 |
| Post-S7: Final verification & wrap-up | 731–796 | 34 | 23 | 1,326 | $0.74 |
Git Commits (7)
* f266fb6 (10 minutes) <Riza Fahmi> Complete S7: handle terminal Ctrl-C with partial summary and exit 130
* a3d65e9 (19 minutes) <Riza Fahmi> Complete S6: report elapsed time and latency percentiles
* 3d122a2 (22 minutes) <Riza Fahmi> Complete S5: report HTTP outcomes and exit codes
* ebafcbc (25 minutes) <Riza Fahmi> Complete S4: paced 5-second loop with rate limiting and timeout cancellation
* 55c2577 (29 minutes) <Riza Fahmi> Complete S3: send bounded GET with streaming, TLS verification, and 2s timeout
* 5b9b145 (36 minutes) <Riza Fahmi> Complete S2: validate CLI arguments with exit code 2 on errors
* 911df8a (38 minutes) <Riza Fahmi> Complete S1: launch CLI with help and resolved entry pointNotes & Key Findings
5 findingsBusy-Polling Background Tasks Burnt ~31% of Total Cost ($1.68)
- Whenever a
run_commandcall exceeded the 10-second synchronous wait cap (WaitMsBeforeAsync: 10000), the harness backgrounded it (24 times total) and automatically emitted asystem_messagewakeup when the command finished. - Instead of ending its turn and waiting for that
system_message, the agent polledmanage_task(Action: "status")99 times (plus 6 kill calls = 105manage_taskcalls, or 27.1% of all 388 LLM turns) every ~3.5 seconds. - During the final
mix testruns in S7 and Post-S7 (which took 102.1s and 101.9s at steps 671 and 738), the agent polledmanage_task24 times and 22 times in a row while context was at its peak (~250k–268k tokens). - Impact: Those 105
manage_taskturns alone consumed 19.44M cached tokens and 253k uncached input tokens, costing $1.68 (30.9% of the entire $5.43 run). Stopping and waiting for the reactivesystem_messagewould have cut LLM calls from 388 to ~283 and saved ~$1.68.
- Whenever a
Erlang/Elixir SIGINT (Ctrl-C) Handling Dominated Complexity (47% of Calls)
- S1 + S7 accounted for 183 of 388 LLM calls (47.2%) and 52.5% of all thinking tokens (36,341 / 69,199).
- Why: In S1 (steps 28–123), the agent tried calling
:os.set_signal(:sigint, :handle)andSystem.trap_signal(:sigint, ...)and hit BEAM's built-in restriction: Erlang's signal server intercepts SIGINT for the interactive BREAK menu and Elixir'sSystem.trap_signal/3explicitly disallows:sigintvia guard clauses. - Four of the agent's 5
search_webcalls were spent researching BEAM/escript SIGINT handling before it arrived at the working architecture in cb: a POSIX shell wrapper that traps INT, runs escript with+Bi(disabling the BEAM break handler), and forwards SIGTERM to the BEAM process soSystem.trap_signal(:sigterm, ...)can cleanly stop the benchmark loop. - While prototyping this with
erl -helpand Pythonpty.openpty()scripts (steps 38, 65, 73, 111, 596, 605), 6 commands hung waiting on terminal I/O and had to be killed after 10–23s.
Context Caching Saved 87% on Input Cost ($36.72 Saved)
- 98.11% cache hit ratio Out of 55,453,077 total prompt tokens sent across the 388 turns, 54,406,484 were served from cache (
cache_read_tokens). - Zero mid-run cache invalidations: Only 7 steps had
cache_read_tokens: 0—all within the first 15 steps (1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 15) while the initial prompt was warming up. All 381 subsequent LLM calls achieved a cache hit. - Dollar impact: Without implicit caching, 55.45M input tokens at $0.75/1M would have cost $41.59 (total run $42.16). Caching reduced input cost to $4.87 ($0.78 uncached + $4.08 cached), saving $36.72 (82% of total cost).
- 98.11% cache hit ratio Out of 55,453,077 total prompt tokens sent across the 388 turns, 54,406,484 were served from cache (
Compounding Effect: Sequential 5s Integration Tests × 268k Context Window
- Context grew steadily from 10,704 tokens (step 1) to 268,770 tokens (step 796), spending the last 112 LLM calls above 200k tokens.
- At the same time, because each slice added real-time CLI integration tests (5-second benchmark loops and 2-second timeouts),
mix testwall-clock time grew from 0.75s (S1) → 12.7s (S3) → 27.5s (S4) → 51.4s (S5) → 102.1s (S7). - Running full
mix testsuites late in the conversation when context was ~250k+ tokens—combined with the 10s backgrounding threshold—caused the final verification (Post-S7, just 2 test runs) to cost $0.74, more than S2 ($0.20), S4 ($0.52), S5 ($0.59), or S6 ($0.38). - Takeaway for test design: Running targeted unit/simulated-clock tests during iteration and reserving full 5-second real-clock CLI suite runs (
mix test --only integration) for final checks keepsmix testunder the 10s threshold and avoids background-polling spirals.
High Edit Precision (99.2% Tool Success Rate)
- Out of 387 tool calls, only 3 returned tool errors (0.78% error rate):
- Step 156:
write_filefailed once becausetest/capy_bench_test.exsalready existed (Overwrite: truewas omitted). - Steps 539 & 545:
edit_filefailed twice on target string mismatches intest/cb_timing_test.exsduring S6 and immediately self-corrected. - All
mix credoand Elixir 1.20 type-checking warnings (steps 191, 247, 343, 359) were caught and fixed before each slice's commit.